- Getting started
- Project management
- Working with Change Impact Analysis
- Create test cases
- Assigning test cases to requirements
- Cloning test cases
- Exporting test cases
- Linking test cases in Studio to Test Manager
- Delete test cases
- Enabling governance at project level
- Disabling governance at project level
- Enabling governance at test-case level
- Disabling governance at test-case level
- Enabling or disabling governance in bulk for test cases
- Enforcing signing order for governed test cases
- Managing approvers for governed test cases
- Managing governed test cases in the In Work state
- Managing governed test cases in the In Review state
- Managing governed objects in the Signed state
- Managing comments for governed test cases
- Viewing governance information for test case logs
- Managing approvers for governed test case logs
- Managing governed test case logs in the In Work state
- Managing governed test case logs in the In Review state
- Managing governed test case logs in the Signed state
- Managing comments for governed test case logs
- Enabling governance at test case log level
- Disabling governance at test case log level
- Viewing and searching test cases
- Project operations and utilities
- Test Manager settings
- Tenant level settings
- General project settings
- Events
- Subscribing to events
- Subscribing to all events
- Unsubscribing from events
- Unsubscribing from all events
- Unsubscribing from the Notifications settings page
- Viewing notifications
- Filtering notifications
- Viewing email notifications
- Enabling email notifications for SMTP servers
- Viewing only unread notifications
- Marking all notifications as read
- Clearing all notifications
- Deleting notifications
- Customer managed keys encryption
- Audit logs
- ALM tool integration
- ALM tool integration
- Test Manager Connect
- Test Manager - Integration Service connector
- Outbound IP ranges for connectors
- Working with SAP Cloud ALM and Test Manager
- Step 1: Integrating SAP Cloud ALM with Test Manager
- Step 2: Creating automated test cases in SAP Cloud ALM
- Step 3: Creating automated test cases in Test Manager
- Step 4: Synchronizing test cases from Test Manager to SAP Cloud ALM
- Step 5: Assigning test automations to test cases
- Step 6: Executing test cases
- SAP test automation best practices
- Troubleshooting the Jira integration
- API integration
- Coding Agents for Testing
- Troubleshooting
Performance test rules in Workflow Analyzer
Three Workflow Analyzer rules that check whether a project is ready for performance testing, including what each rule flags and how to resolve it.
Three Workflow Analyzer rules check whether your project is ready to run as a performance test. The rules appear in Studio while you design, so you can find problems before a test run. They apply to the Test Automation and Development scopes.
| Rule | Name | Default severity |
|---|---|---|
| PT-BLK-001 | Performance Test Blocking Issues | Warning |
| PT-ADV-001 | Performance Test Advisories | Info |
| PT-APP-001 | Performance Test Application Type | Info |
PT-BLK-001: Performance Test Blocking Issues
This rule flags automation that a performance test can't run as intended. These findings must be resolved before performance results are reliable.
| What it catches | Why it's a problem | What to do |
|---|---|---|
| Classic UI Automation browser activities, for example Open Browser and Browser Scope | The performance tooling can't measure the classic UI Automation stack, so results are unreliable. | Replace them with the modern UI Automation activities, such as Use Application/Browser and its child activities. |
| Incognito turned on where it can't work | Incognito requires UiPath.UIAutomation.Activities 26.10.0 or later, and the card must use a WebDriver or Chromium automation mode: WithGUI, Headless, DevTools, or DevToolsHeadless. If the rule can't determine the package version, the message says so. | Turn Incognito off for that card, or upgrade the package and select a supported browser mode. |
| Hardware Events input mode in a browser scope | Hardware Events go through the single input queue of the operating system. Results become erratic under load, and the test can't run several Virtual Users at once. | Switch the input mode to another option, such as Simulate or Chromium API. |
The Hardware Events check flags a card or child activity when Hardware Events is set directly, inherited from a parent scope, or applied by default. The default applies to browser cards with no mode set in Windows projects. A child activity set to Same as card follows the mode of the card.
PT-ADV-001: Performance Test Advisories
This rule flags activities that run correctly but scale poorly when several Virtual Users share one machine. Each finding is advisory, not an error indicator.
| What it catches | Why it matters | Suggestion |
|---|---|---|
| Global desktop interaction: window management, screen capture, and Send Hotkey with no target and no enclosing application scope | Virtual Users on the same machine interfere with each other, and these activities fail in headless runs. | Use activities that target a specific element by selector. |
| Image matching and OCR activities | They need a visual desktop session and don't scale across Virtual Users. | Use selector-based activities. |
Computer Vision: a Computer Vision activity, or a target whose search steps include CV | Image recognition adds delay and varies from call to call, so measurements are unstable. | Use selectors to identify elements. |
| Local file access (Info level) | Concurrent Virtual Users access the same file paths, which causes locking errors and corrupted data. | Use a unique path for each Virtual User, isolated temporary folders, or API or database calls instead of files. |
File access is harmless when each Virtual User already has its own path. The rule can't detect this, so it flags every use.
PT-APP-001: Performance Test Application Type
This rule always reports a result. It doesn't point out a mistake. It reports the application type that the robot uses for your project, and whether that type allows more than one Virtual User per machine.
| Detected type | Virtual Users per machine |
|---|---|
| API (HTTP requests), Chrome, Edge | Multiple |
| Windows application, or classic UI Automation (Default) | One |
The message reads similar to: Detected application type: Chrome. This test can run multiple Virtual Users per machine.
How the application type is chosen
- Classic UI Automation browser activities set the type to Default immediately, which allows a single Virtual User.
- Otherwise, the rule picks the type by priority: Windows, then Browser (Chrome or Edge), then API. If your project mixes types, the rule also reports
Multiple application types detected … Resolved primary type by priority …. Without this rule, the mismatch only appears after a dry run. - The rule assumes Windows when the type is unclear. Any desktop hint from PT-ADV-001 makes the project a Windows application: global desktop interaction, image matching or OCR, and file access. A custom activity that the analyzer can't inspect has the same effect, because it might interact with the desktop. A project with no hints also defaults to Windows.
Custom activities and libraries
The analyzer inspects the workflows of the custom (non-UiPath) activity packages in your project. It reads them from your local NuGet package cache, so it also reports problems inside a library.
When the analyzer can't inspect a package, PT-APP-001 lists it in a note and treats the project as a Windows application. The following table lists the possible reasons.
| Reason | What to do |
|---|---|
| The package isn't in the local cache. | Restore the dependency and run the analysis again. |
| The package contains only compiled activities, with no workflow files. | No action is available. The analyzer can't inspect compiled activities. |
| No workflow in the package matches the activity name. | No action is available. |
| The workflow file couldn't be read. | No action is available. |
| The limit on the number of analyzed workflows was reached. | No action is available. |