Interpreting failed results

In this example, Load Group 1 shows the status Failed because the configured service level objective (SLO) for response time was violated.

• HTTP response time: The chart shows multiple spikes above the defined threshold of 1,000 ms, with peaks reaching over 5,000 ms. These consistent threshold violations triggered the failed status.
• HTTP errors and automation errors: Both remained at 0%, so the failure was not due to request errors or automation breakdowns, but purely due to performance degradation.
• Automation step duration: Execution times for steps fluctuated heavily, with some activities taking significantly longer than expected, further indicating instability in application response.
• Infrastructure metrics: Robot CPU and memory usage stayed within acceptable ranges, showing that the issue was not related to insufficient infrastructure capacity, but rather to the performance of the system under test itself.

Because response times repeatedly exceeded the threshold, the system flagged the group as Failed. This result highlights that while functional execution was correct, the application did not meet the expected performance levels under the applied load.